Understanding the prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in people with cerebral palsy: A systematic review protocol
Eres, R.; Dutia, I.; Mulraney, M.; Walsh, M.; Sawyer, S.; Reddihough, D.; Coghill, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is an abundance of research investigating physical health outcomes in people with cerebral palsy, however evidence from studies investigating psychiatric disorders in this group is less well developed. Specifically, there is little research synthesising the prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in people with cerebral palsy, and there is no summary of the instruments used to measure this. This systematic review will summarise the current body of evidence investigating psychiatric disorders in people with cerebral palsy, as well as the measurement or diagnostic instruments used to measure psychiatric disorder. FindingsTo be included in the review, articles must report on psychiatric disorders in people with cerebral palsy or use standardised tools that allow for clinical thresholds to be derived, written in English, and published after 1980. A comprehensive, electronic database search strategy will be implemented targeting relevant papers indexed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and PubMed. Searches will include terms that relate to psychiatric disorders (E.g., mood disorders, anxiety disorders, ADHD, autism) in people with cerebral palsy. Data will be extracted based on age, psychiatric disorder, and cerebral palsy severity. We will summarise the findings as a narrative and will provide overall prevalence estimates for psychiatric disorders. DiscussionThe systematic review will provide novel insights into the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in people with cerebral palsy. It will also provide recommendations about the types of instruments that have been used and implemented in health research related to cerebral palsy. It will guide future work on interventions and primary research in clinical sciences and allied health disciplines.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Physical Health Trajectories of Young People with Neurodevelopmental Conditions: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies 94%
- Individual participant data systematic reviews with meta-analyses of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A protocol 93%
- Mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms: a protocol for a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 93%
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 93%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Global burden of mental health problems among children and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic umbrella review 93%
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 92%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A tool to assess risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of mental health disorders (RoB-PrevMH) 92%
- Quantifying Care, Qualifying Experiences: A Systematic Review of Measurement-Based Care in Psychiatry from Patient and Provider Perspectives 91%
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.