Using Random Forests with Asymmetric Costs to Predict Hospital Readmissions
Bleich, J.; Cole, B.; Kapelner, A.; Baillie, C. A.; Gupta, R.; Hanish, A.; Calgua, E.; Umscheid, C. A.; Berk, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundSufficiently accurate predictions of hospital readmissions are necessary for the allocation of scare clinical resources to reduce preventable readmissions. We describe the use of a data-driven approach that relies on machine learning algorithms to predict readmission at the time of discharge. MethodsWe employ random forests to clinical and administrative electronic health record data available from a cohort of 103,688 patients discharged from the acute inpatient settings of the University of Pennsylvania Health System between June 25th, 2011 and June 30th, 2013. We predict both 30-day all-cause readmissions and 7-day unplanned readmissions using only predictors available by the time of discharge. Using oversampling and undersampling of the different outcome classes of readmission and no readmission, we incorporate into our models the asymmetric costs of a false negative relative to a false positive from the perspective of a hospital. We calculate variable importance scores for included predictors. Our approach was derived and validated using split-sample internal validation. ResultsWe developed a machine learning-based model using random forests with a 5:1 relative cost ratio for 30-day all-cause readmissions that achieves a sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 71% on validation data, as well as a random forests model with a 20:1 cost ratio for 7-day unplanned readmissions that achieves a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 66% on validation data. Prior health system utilization, clinical discharging service, and vital sign information were most predictive of readmissions. ConclusionBy modeling the complex relationships between many predictor variables and readmission data for a large health system, we demonstrate successful predictive models that can be used upon discharge to flag patients at high risk of readmission.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 97%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 96%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 95%
- A machine learning approach to identifying important features for achieving step thresholds in individuals with chronic stroke 94%
- Identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients using machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 95%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 94%
- Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.