An update to the LIFEtime-perspective CardioVascular Disease (LIFE-CVD) model for prediction of individualized lifetime benefit from cardiovascular risk factor management in apparently healthy people
de Vries, T. I.; Jaspers, N. E. M.; Visseren, F. L. J.; Dorresteijn, J. A. N.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe previously developed LIFEtime-perspective CardioVascular Disease (LIFE-CVD) model can be used to predict lifetime cardiovascular disease risk, CVD-free life expectancy, and lifetime benefit from cardiovascular risk factor treatment in apparently healthy people aged 45 to 80 years. However, there was an unmet need to be able to apply the model in patients younger than 45 years, and to accurately estimate treatment effects in patients with a life expectancy exceeding 90 years. AimUpdate the LIFE-CVD model to enable application of the model in people aged 35 to 89 years, and to allow more accurate estimation of treatment effects in patients with a life expectancy exceeding 90 years. MethodsThe study was conducted using data from the same studies as were used for derivation and validation of the original model, including the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) cohort, and the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Netherlands (EPIC-NL) and EPIC-Norfolk cohort studies. Age-specific baseline survivals were smoothed by predicting the progression of baseline survivals with age, using a local polynomial regression function and a exponential function for CVD, and non-CVD mortality baseline survivals respectively. Using these functions, baseline survivals were then extrapolated to the age range of 35 to 100 years. External validation using the newly updated baseline survivals was performed. ResultsPerformance of the updated model was not dissimilar from the original model, with C-statistics for discrimination ranging from 0.70-0.76 in the external study populations. Calibration plots showed a good agreement between predicted and observed 10-year CVD risks. Estimation of treatment effects in patients with a life expectancy exceeding 90 years was improved. ConclusionThis update of the LIFE-CVD model improves the clinical usability of the model by increasing the age range and improving the method of estimation of lifetime treatment effects.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 95%
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 91%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 93%
- Latent class regression improves the predictive acuity and clinical utility of survival prognostication amongst chronic heart failure patients. 93%
- Introducing riskCommunicator: an R package to obtain interpretable effect estimates for public health 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advanced ECG heart age estimation applicable to both sinus and non-sinus rhythm associates with cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular morbidity, and survival 92%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 91%
- Development and Validation of a parsimonious AI-Based Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure: A UK cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a risk prediction algorithm for high-risk populations combining genetic and conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease 94%
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 90%
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction and estimating benefits from novel interventions 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heart age estimated using explainable advanced electrocardiography 93%
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 92%
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.