Reporting results of diagnostic NGS-based testing - user-centered redesign of the clinical report.
Agafonov, O.; Vik, S.; Kjolas, K.; Alagaratnam, S.
Show abstract
1AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe transition of next-generation sequencing (NGS) from the research environment to clinical diagnostics has proven difficult, with exome and whole genome sequencing at various stages of implementation in Nordic hospitals. The clinical genomics report details key findings from the interpretation of NGS data and represents the core hand-off between specialized clinical genomics laboratories and the broader healthcare community. However, these text-heavy reports can be difficult to read: critical information may be scattered around the report, and vital information such as limitations of the test may not always be present. Misunderstanding of results, limitations or key findings can lead to incorrect therapeutic decisions, directly impacting patient management. We applied the principles of user-centred design to redesign clinical reports to respond to user needs, while also incorporating existing recommendations and guidelines. We performed several rounds of needs gathering, first with producers of clinical genetics reports, then with clinicians with various level of experience in genetic testing. Based on the insights from a workshop and interviews, we created prototypes of reports which were evaluated in comparison to a set of simulated reports representing those currently in clinical production. Our results showed that the majority of evaluators found the redesigned reports to be clearer and easier to process, demonstrating the value of this approach.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ClinGen Variant Curation Interface Workshops: Training Variant Scientists on an International Platform 94%
- The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change 93%
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 96%
- Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions 93%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variant Scientists in Genomic Medicine: Survey of Demographics, Training, Duties, and Professional Development 94%
- Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Prenatal Diagnostic Testing 92%
- Identification of a CCG-enriched expanded allele in DM1 patients using Amplification-free long-read sequencing 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 94%
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 91%
- Early Diagnosis of Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Through AI-Powered Facial Analysis: Results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 91%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 91%
- STRipy: a graphical application for enhanced genotyping of pathogenic short tandem repeats in sequencing data 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.