Back

Rootstocks influence the response of ripening grape berries to leafroll associated viruses

Vondras, A. M.; Lerno, L.; Massonnet, M.; Minio, A.; Rowhani, A.; Liang, D.; Quiroz, D.; Figueroa-Balderas, R.; Golino, D.; Ebeler, S. E.; Al Rwanhnih, M.; Cantu, D.

2021-03-15 plant biology
10.1101/2021.03.14.434319 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grapevine leafroll-associated virus (GLRaV) infections are accompanied by symptoms with varying severity. Using a dedicated experimental vineyard, we studied the responses to GLRaVs in ripening berries from Cabernet franc grapevines grafted to different rootstocks and with zero, one, or pairs of leafroll infection(s). RNA sequencing data were mapped to a high-quality Cabernet franc genome reference assembled to carry out this study and integrated with hormone and metabolite abundance data. This study identified several molecular levers that participate in responses to GLRaVs, including those that are condition-dependent. This included describing common responses to GLRaVs that were reproduced in two consecutive years, in plants grafted to different rootstocks, and in more than one infection condition. Though different infections were inconsistently distinguishable from one another overall, the effects of infections in plants grafted to different rootstocks were distinct at each developmental stage. Conserved responses included the modulation of pathogen detecting genes, increases in abscisic acid signaling and cytoskeleton remodeling gene expression. The abundance of abscisic acid (ABA), related metabolites, ABA and hormone signaling-related gene expression, and the expression of several transcription factor families differentiated rootstocks overall. These data show that rootstock influences the effect of GLRaVs in ripening berries.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.