A Preliminary Characterization of Canonicalized and Non-Canonicalized Section Headers Across Variable Clinical Note Types
Wang, J.; Yu, S.; Davoudi, A.; Mowery, D.
Show abstract
In the electronic health record, the majority of clinically relevant information is stored within clinical notes. Most clinical notes follow a set organizational structure composed of canonicalized section headers that facilitate clinical review and information gathering. Standardized section header terminologies such as the SecTag terminology permit the identification and standardization of headers to a canonicalized form. Although the SecTag terminology has been evaluated extensively for history & physical notes, the coverage of canonical section header terms has not been assessed across other note types. For this pilot study, we conducted a coverage study and characterization of canonical section headers across 5 common, clinical note types and a generalizability study of canonical section headers detected within two types of clinical notes from Penn Medicine.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Symptom Lexicon Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Notes 95%
- ConceptWAS: a high-throughput method for early identification of COVID-19 presenting symptoms 95%
- Detecting Goals of Care Conversations in Clinical Notes with Active Learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
- A Simple Electronic Medical Record System Designed for Research 93%
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 93%
- Temporal Relationship of Computed and Structured Diagnoses in Electronic Health Record Data 92%
- Evaluating Semantic Similarity Methods for Comparison of Text-derived Phenotype Profiles 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the impact on clinical task efficiency of a natural language processing algorithm for searching medical documents: Prospective crossover study 96%
- Transformative potential of Large Language Models in data mining on Electronic Health Records. 94%
- An Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation of Learned COVID-19 Concepts using Open-Source Word Embedding Sources 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.