Back

Reconciliation of theoretical and empirical brain criticality via network heterogeneity

Gu, L.; Ruqian, W.

2021-03-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.03.11.435016 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inspired by heterogeneity in biological neural networks, we explore a heterogeneous network consisting of receipt, transmission and computation layers. It reconciles the dilemma that the data analysis scheme for empirical records yields non-power laws when applied to microscopic simulation of critical neural dynamics. Detailed analysis shows that the reconciliation is due to synchronization effect of the feedforward connectivity. The network favours avalanches with denser activity in the first half of life, and the result is consistent with the experimental observation. This heterogeneous structure facilitates robust criticality against external stimuli, which implies the inappropriateness of interpreting the subcritcality signature as an indication of subcrtical dynamics. These results propose the network heterogeneity as an essential piece for understanding the brain criticality.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.3%
3
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
4
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
9
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
12
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
13
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
14
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
18
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%