Back

Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

Horby, P. W.; Estcourt, L.; Peto, L.; Emberson, J. R.; Staplin, N.; Spata, E.; Pessoa-Amorim, G.; Campbell, M.; Roddick, A.; Brunskill, N. E.; George, T.; Zehnder, D.; Tiberi, S.; Aung, N. N.; Uriel, A.; Widdrington, J.; Koshy, G.; Brown, T.; Scott, S.; Baillie, J. K.; Buch, M. H.; Chappell, L. C.; Day, J. N.; Faust, S. N.; Jaki, T.; Jeffery, K.; Juszczak, E.; Lim, W. S.; Montgomery, A.; Mumford, A.; Rowan, K.; Thwaites, G.; Mafham, M.; Roberts, D.; Haynes, R.; Landray, M. J.

2021-03-10 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.03.09.21252736 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTreatment of COVID-19 patients with plasma containing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. MethodsIn this randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]) several possible treatments are being compared with usual care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to receive either usual care plus high titre convalescent plasma or usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. FindingsBetween 28 May 2020 and 15 January 2021, 5795 patients were randomly allocated to receive convalescent plasma and 5763 to usual care alone. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the two groups: 1398 (24%) of 5795 patients allocated convalescent plasma and 1408 (24%) of 5763 patients allocated usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio [RR] 1{middle dot}00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0{middle dot}93 to 1{middle dot}07; p=0{middle dot}93). The 28-day mortality rate ratio was similar in all prespecified subgroups of patients, including in those patients without detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at randomisation. Allocation to convalescent plasma had no significant effect on the proportion of patients discharged from hospital within 28 days (66% vs. 67%; rate ratio 0{middle dot}98; 95% CI 0{middle dot}94-1{middle dot}03, p=0{middle dot}50). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or death (28% vs. 29%; rate ratio 0{middle dot}99; 95% CI 0{middle dot}93-1{middle dot}05, p=0{middle dot}79). InterpretationAmong patients hospitalised with COVID-19, high-titre convalescent plasma did not improve survival or other prespecified clinical outcomes. FundingUK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research (Grant refs: MC_PC_19056; COV19-RECPLA).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
4
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
7
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
25
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%