Prevalence of sleep disturbance and associated risk factors in UK Biobank participants with alcohol use disorders and major depression
Kolla, B. P.; Biernacka, J. M.; Mansukhani, M. P.; Colby, C.; Coombes, B. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionCurrent understanding of the differences in sleep disturbance (SD) and associated risk factors in patients with alcohol use disorders (AUD), major depressive disorders (MDD), and comorbid AUD+MDD is limited. MethodsData from the UK Biobank (UKB) (n=47,825) were utilized to categorize subjects into those with MDD (n=5,991), AUD (n=12,952), both (MDD+AUD)(n=3,219), and controls (n=25,663). We used generalized linear models (GLMs) to test whether rates of SD and sleep duration differed among the groups and determine the clinical predictors of SD. Rates of SD and sleep duration were compared using regression analyses accounting for demographic (age, sex, ethnicity, and Townsend deprivation index) and clinical (body mass index, neuroticism score, and alcohol consumption) factors. ResultsAfter accounting for diagnostic category, SD was associated with age, female sex, white ethnicity, and higher BMI, neuroticism and alcohol consumption scores (all p<0.0001). The unadjusted prevalence of SD was 25.6%, 25.9%, 39.2%, and 41.1% in control, AUD, MDD, and MDD+AUD categories respectively. Rates of SD in controls and AUD group as well as MDD alone and MDD+AUD did not differ in unadjusted models (p=0.45 and 0.075, respectively). Prevalence of SD differed in the four groups (p<0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons) after adjusting for demographic confounders. After further adjustment for clinical factors, effect sizes were reduced, but pairwise comparisons remained significant, except in the AUD versus MDD group (all p<0.05). After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, sleep duration did not differ among the groups. ConclusionDemographic and clinical characteristics associated with SD were similar in patients with MDD, AUD, and MDD+AUD. The differences in rates of SD between the diagnostic groups were attenuated but persisted after accounting for these confounders. Genetic and other factors capable of influencing SD in patients with MDD, AUD, and comorbid MDD+AUD merit future investigation.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal transcriptome-wide gene expression analysis of sleep deprivation treatment shows involvement of circadian genes and immune pathways 93%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 92%
- Correspondence between sleep patterns and anhedonia in adult male mice exposed to early-life stress 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gamma-hydroxybutyrate to promote slow-wave sleep in major depressive disorder: a randomized crossover trial 95%
- Sex-dependent changes in murine striatal dopamine release, sleep, and behavior during spontaneous Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol abstinence 94%
- Genetic overlap between mood instability and alcohol-related phenotypes suggests shared biological underpinnings 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased aperiodic neural activity during sleep in major depressive disorder 93%
- Pathway-Specific Polygenic Scores for Lithium Response for Predicting Clinical Lithium Treatment Response in Patients with Bipolar Disorder 90%
- Altered physiological, affective, and functional connectivity responses to acute stress in patients with alcohol use disorder 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional Variation in the FAAH Gene is Directly Associated with Subjective Well-being and Indirectly Associated with Problematic Alcohol Use 90%
- Reduced Expression of Slc Genes in the VTA and NAcc of Male Mice with Positive Fighting Experience 89%
- Unveiling sex-based differences in the effects of alcohol abuse: a comprehensive functional meta-analysis of transcriptomic studies 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.