Back

Explainable AI for Retinal Prostheses: Predicting Electrode Deactivation from Routine Clinical Measures

Hu, Z.; Beyeler, M.

2021-03-09 health informatics
10.1101/2021.03.07.21253092 medRxiv
Show abstract

To provide appropriate levels of stimulation, retinal prostheses must be calibrated to an individuals perceptual thresholds ( system fitting). Nonfunctional electrodes may then be deactivated to reduce power consumption and improve visual outcomes. However, thresholds vary drastically not just across electrodes but also over time, thus calling for a more flexible electrode deactivation strategy. Here we present an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model fit on a large longitudinal dataset that can 1) predict at which point in time the manufacturer chose to deactivate an electrode as a function of routine clinical measures ( predictors) and 2) reveal which of these predictors were most important. The model predicted electrode deactivation from clinical data with 60.8% accuracy. Performance increased to 75.3% with system fitting data, and to 84% when thresholds from follow-up examinations were available. The model further identified subject age and time since blindness onset as important predictors of electrode deactivation. An accurate XAI model of electrode deactivation that relies on routine clinical measures may benefit both the retinal implant and wider neuroprosthetics communities.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.7%
50% of probability mass above
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
5
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
11
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
20
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%