A Rapid Method to Evaluate Pre-Travel Testing Programs for COVID-19: A Study in Hawaii
Hou, A. T.; Pang, G. C.; Mills, K. M.; Bayudan, K. L.; Moore, D. M.; Medina, L. P.; Pang, L. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundPre-travel testing programs are being implemented around the world to curb COVID-19 and its variants from incoming travelers. A common approach is a single pre-travel test, 72 hours before departure, such as in Hawaii; however this raises concerns for those who are incubating or those infected after pre-travel testing or during transit. We need a rapid method to assess the effectiveness of pre-travel testing programs, and we use Hawaii as our case study. MethodsWe invited travelers departing from Kahului main airport at the end of their visit to Maui (major tourist destination among the Hawaiian islands) and performed COVID-19 PCR testing. Eligible participants needed a negative pre-travel test and a Hawaiian stay [≤] 14 days. We designed for anonymous testing at the end of travel so that travel plans would be unaffected, and we aimed for [≥] 70% study participation. ResultsAmong consecutive eligible travelers, 282 consented and 111 declined to participate, leading to a 72% (67-76%, 95% confidence interval) participation rate. Among 281 tested participants, two were positive with COVID-19, with an estimated positivity rate of 7 cases per 1,000 travelers. The top states of residence are California (58%) and Washington (21%). The mean length of stay was 7.7 {+/-} 0.2 days. Regarding pre-travel testing, 87% had non-nasopharyngeal tests and 66% had self-administered tests. ConclusionsThis positivity rate leads to an estimated 17-30 infected travelers arriving daily to Maui in November-December 2020, and an estimated 52-70 infected travelers arriving daily to Hawaii during the same period. These counts surpass the Maui District Health Offices projected ability to accommodate 10 infected visitors daily in Maui; therefore, an additional mitigation layer for travelers is recommended. This rapid field study can be replicated widely in airports to assess effectiveness of pre-travel programs and can be expanded to evaluate COVID-19 importation and its variants.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of veterinary diagnostic laboratories during COVID-19 response in the United States 92%
- Epidemiological characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 cases and positivity in subsequent RT-PCR tests in the United Arab Emirates 91%
- Opinions of Former Jail Residents about Self-collection of SARS-CoV-2 Specimens, Paired with Wastewater Surveillance: A Qualitative Study Rapidly Examining Acceptability of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness of full and partial travel bans against COVID-19 spread in Australia for travellers from China. 92%
- Identifying weather variables as important clinical predictors of bacterial diarrhea among international travelers to Nepal and Thailand 91%
- Effectiveness of interventions targeting air travellers for delaying local outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical symptoms among ambulatory patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 90%
- SARS-CoV-2 Epidemiology on a Public University Campus in Washington State 89%
- Acceptability, usability and performance of lateral flow immunoassay tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: REACT-2 study of self-testing in non-healthcare key workers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron (BA.1) surge in New York City (NYC), January 1-March 16, 2022 91%
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020 91%
- Longitudinal testing for respiratory and gastrointestinal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in day care centres in Hesse, Germany. Results of the SAFE KiDS Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.