Back

The status of current and tentative marine natural World Heritage areas

Kuempel, C.; Simmons, B. A.; Davey, M.

2021-03-01 ecology
10.1101/2021.02.28.433275 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The 1972 World Heritage Convention (WHC), along with the 1994 Global Strategy, aim to preserve the outstanding universal value of internationally important cultural and natural sites within a "representative, balanced and credible" network of highly-protected areas. Increasing human pressures and shortfalls in representation have been documented across the World Heritage network, particularly in terrestrial and cultural sites, threatening the integrity and primary goals of the WHC. However, the conservation status of current and tentative (i.e., proposed) marine natural World Heritage areas remains relatively unknown. We assessed the extent of recent (2013) and historical (2008-2013) cumulative human impacts and several metrics of representation (country, continent, ecoregion, wilderness, and threatened species) within existing and tentative marine natural World Heritage areas. We found moderate yet increasing cumulative human impacts across most existing sites, and high or very high impacts across the majority of tentative sites. Climate change impacts comprised nearly 75% of impact scores, on average, and differences in land and marine impacts across sites could help prioritise management decisions. Over 75% of marine ecoregions and 85% of threatened species considered in this study have no representation within the existing marine natural World Heritage network. We outline examples of how prioritizing representation across tentative sites for future World Heritage listing could greatly increase these measures. We urge the WHC to adopt quantitative, systematic and transparent evaluations of how current and tentative sites contribute to the overarching goals of maintaining a representative World Heritage network and preserving their outstanding universal values for future generations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
6
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
9
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
12
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
16
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
24
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%