Back

Delivering on Biden's 2030 conservation commitment

Simmons, B. A.; Nolte, C.; McGowan, J.

2021-03-01 ecology
10.1101/2021.02.28.433244 bioRxiv
Show abstract

On January 27, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, committing the United States to various goals within his campaigns major climate policy, the Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Included in this executive order is a commitment to "conserving at least 30 percent of [the United States] lands and oceans by 2030." This ambitious conservation target signals a promising direction for biodiversity in the United States. However, while the executive order outlines several goals for climate mitigation, the 30x30 target remains vague in its objectives, actions, and implementation strategies for protecting biodiversity. Biodiversity urgently needs effective conservation action, but it remains unclear where and what this 30% target will be applied to. Achieving different climate and biodiversity objectives will require different strategies and, in combination with the associated costs of implementation, will lead to different priority areas for conservation actions. Here, we illustrate what the 30% target could look like across four objectives reflective of the ambitious goals outlined in the executive order. We compile several variations of terrestrial protected area networks guided by these different objectives and examine the trade-offs in costs, ecosystem representation, and climate mitigation potential between each. We find little congruence in priority areas across objectives, emphasizing just how crucial it will be for the Biden administration to develop clear objectives and establish appropriate performance metrics from the outset to maximize both conservation and climate outcomes in support of the 30x30 target. We discuss important considerations that must guide the administrations conservation strategies in order to ensure meaningful conservation outcomes can be achieved over the next decade.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
3
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
4
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
6
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
8
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
11
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
24
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%