Back
Top 0.9%
11.7%
Top 16%
10.9%
#1
10.9%
Top 1%
9.2%
Top 1%
6.4%
Top 3%
6.4%
Top 1%
6.4%
Top 16%
6.4%
Top 4%
5.0%
Top 82%
5.0%
Top 2%
1.9%
Top 3%
1.9%
Top 11%
1.5%
Top 7%
1.0%
Top 2%
1.0%
Top 9%
0.9%
Top 3%
0.9%
Top 8%
0.7%
Top 4%
0.7%
Top 14%
0.7%
Top 6%
0.7%
Deep learning saliency maps do not accurately highlight diagnostically relevant regions for medical image interpretation
2021-03-02
health informatics
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
Saliency methods, which "explain" deep neural networks by producing heat maps that highlight the areas of the medical image that influence model prediction, are often presented to clinicians as an aid in diagnostic decision-making. Although many saliency methods have been proposed for medical imaging interpretation, rigorous investigation of the accuracy and reliability of these strategies is necessary before they are integrated into the clinical setting. In this work, we quantitatively evaluate...
Predicted journal destinations
1
npj Digital Medicine
85 training papers
2
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
39 training papers
4
PLOS Digital Health
88 training papers
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
36 training papers
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
53 training papers
7
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
37 training papers
8
Nature Communications
483 training papers
9
JAMIA Open
35 training papers
10
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
16 training papers
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 training papers
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
81 training papers
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
41 training papers
15
Patterns
15 training papers
16
eBioMedicine
82 training papers
17
Scientific Data
30 training papers
18
Communications Medicine
63 training papers
19
Frontiers in Digital Health
18 training papers
20
PLOS Computational Biology
141 training papers
21
Diagnostics
36 training papers