Back

Donor Anti-Spike Immunity is Related to Recipient Recovery and Can Predict the Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma Units.

Janaka, S. K.; Hartman, W.; Mou, H.; Frazan, M.; Stramer, S. L.; Goodhue, E.; Weiss, J.; Evans, D.; Connor, J. P.

2021-03-01 pathology
10.1101/2021.02.25.21252463 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV2 that causes COVID-19 has resulted in the death of more than 2.31 million people within the last year and yet no cure exists. Whereas passive immunization with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) provides a safe and viable option, selection of optimal units for therapy and lack of clear therapeutic benefit from transfusion remain as barriers to the use of CCP. Study design and methodsTo identify plasma that is expected to benefit recipients, we measured anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody levels using clinically available serological assays and correlated with the neutralizing activity of CCP from donors. Neutralizing titer of plasma samples was measured by assaying infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein pseudotyped retrovirus particles in the presence of dilutions of plasma samples. We also used this assay to identify evidence of passive transfusion of neutralizing activity in CCP recipients. ResultsViral neutralization and anti-spike protein antibodies in 109 samples from 87 plasma donors were highly varied but modestly correlated with each other. Recipients who died of COVID-19 were found to have been transfused with units with lower anti-spike antibody levels and neutralizing activity. Passive transfer of neutralization activity was documented in 62% of antibody naive plasma recipients. ConclusionsSince viral neutralization is the goal of CCP transfusion, our observations not only support the use of anti-spike SARS-CoV2 serology tests to identify beneficial CCP units, but also support the therapeutic value of convalescent plasma with high titers of anti-spike antibodies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
16
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
24
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%