Back

Laboratory-Developed Test for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva Samples at the University of California, Riverside

Hai, R.; Collin, M.; Tsau, S.; Raygoza, D.; Morrison, J.; Carrillo, A. J.; Collier, L. A.; Bayubay, W.; Han, K.; Kaloshian, I.; Borkovich, K. A.

2021-02-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.02.21.21251691 medRxiv
Show abstract

Here we describe a relatively quick, simple, economical and accurate laboratory developed test (LDT) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in heated and diluted saliva samples without RNA extraction. Our protocol is a variation of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign SHIELD LDT. Differences include chilling of the samples during dilution and using a reduced volume for the qRT-PCR reactions. The level of detection for our LDT is 3125 copies/ml, which compares favorably with other saliva-based tests. Initial validation studies with a limited number of patient samples have demonstrated excellent agreement between results using our LDT and those obtained from external laboratories. The cost of consumables for our test is under $8 and a throughput of 1000 tests/day can be achieved with 3-4 personnel.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.