Back

Viral route of infection determines the effect of Drosophila melanogaster gut bacteria on host resistance and tolerance to disease.

Landum, M.; Silva, M. S.; Martins, N.; Teixeira, L.

2021-02-18 immunology
10.1101/2021.02.18.431843 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The microbial community interacting with a host can modulate the outcome of pathogenic infections. For instance, Wolbachia, one of the most prevalent invertebrate endosymbionts, strongly increases resistance of Drosophila melanogaster and other insect hosts, to many RNA viruses. D. melanogaster is also in continuous association with gut bacteria, whose role in antiviral immunity is poorly characterized. Here we asked how gut-colonizing bacteria impact viral titres and host survival, and how these interact with route of infection or Wolbachia presence. We compared germ-free flies and flies associated with two gut bacteria species recently isolated from wild flies (Acetobacter thailandicus and Lactobacillus brevis). We found that Wolbachia-conferred protection to both DCV or FHV is not affected by the presence or absence of these gut bacteria. Flies carrying A. thailandicus have lower DCV loads than germ-free flies, upon systemic infection, but reduced survival, indicating that these bacteria increase resistance to virus and decrease disease tolerance. Association with L. brevis, alone or in combination with A. thailandicus, did not lead to changes in survival to systemic infection. In contrast to the effect on systemic infection, we did not observe an impact of these bacteria on survival or viral loads after oral infection. Overall, the impact of gut-associated bacteria in resistance and tolerance to viruses was mild, when compared with Wolbachia. These results indicate that the effect of gut-associated bacteria to different viral infections, and different routes of infection, is complex and understanding it requires a detailed characterization of several parameters of infection.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
17.9%
2
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Insect Molecular Biology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
6
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
10
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
11
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
16
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
24
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%