Back

Robust clustering and interpretation ofscRNA-seq data using reference componentanalysis

Schmidt, F.; Ranjan, B.; Xiao Xuan Lin, Q.; Krishnan, V.; Joanito, I.; Honardoost, M. A.; Nawaz, Z.; Venkatesh, P. N.; Tan, J.; Rayan, N. A.; Ong, S. T.; Prabhakar, S.

2021-02-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.02.16.431527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationThe transcriptomic diversity of the hundreds of cell types in the human body can be analysed in unprecedented detail using single cell (SC) technologies. Though clustering of cellular transcriptomes is the default technique for defining cell types and subtypes, single cell clustering can be strongly influenced by technical variation. In fact, the prevalent unsupervised clustering algorithms can cluster cells by technical, rather than biological, variation. ResultsCompared to de novo (unsupervised) clustering methods, we demonstrate using multiple benchmarks that supervised clustering, which uses reference transcriptomes as a guide, is robust to batch effects. To leverage the advantages of supervised clustering, we present RCA2, a new, scalable, and broadly applicable version of our RCA algorithm. RCA2 provides a user-friendly framework for supervised clustering and downstream analysis of large scRNA-seq data sets. RCA2 can be seamlessly incorporated into existing algorithmic pipelines. It incorporates various new reference panels for human and mouse, supports generation of custom panels and uses efficient graph-based clustering and sparse data structures to ensure scalability. We demonstrate the applicability of RCA2 on SC data from human bone marrow, healthy PBMCs and PBMCs from COVID-19 patients. Importantly, RCA2 facilitates cell-type-specific QC, which we show is essential for accurate clustering of SC data from heterogeneous tissues. In the era of cohort-scale SC analysis, supervised clustering methods such as RCA2 will facilitate unified analysis of diverse SC datasets. AvailabilityRCA2 is implemented in R and is available at github.com/prabhakarlab/RCAv2

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.