Trial-by-trial fluctuations in post-stimulus attention during memory encoding predict subsequent associative context memory performance.
Elshiekh, A.; Rajah, M. N.
Show abstract
Episodic memory formation rate varies over time partly due to fluctuations in attentional state during memory encoding. Emerging evidence suggests that fluctuations in pre- and/or post-stimulus attention during encoding impact subsequent memory performance. It remains unclear how these fluctuations may differentially impact the subsequent retrieval of items alone, compared to items + their contextual details (associative context memory). In this study, we explored this in 30 healthy younger adults (21-34 years old). We developed the Montreal Attention at Encoding (MAET) task where on each encoding trial, participants responded as quickly as possible to a central fixation cross that expanded in size after a random duration. They then had to encode a picture of an object and its spatial location. Memory for the object-location associations was tested during retrieval. Response time (RT) to the fixation cross presented prior to each object gauged pre-stimulus attention levels on a trial-by-trial basis, while RT to the fixation cross that ensued each object indexed post-stimulus attention levels. Within-subject logistic regressions were used to predict context and item memory performance from pre- and post-stimulus RTs. Results revealed that encoding pre-stimulus attentional levels did not differentially predict context vs. item memory. However, post-stimulus RTs did predict subsequent context retrieval such that, longer post-stimulus RT to the fixation was related to poorer subsequent context retrieval. This study introduces a novel paradigm for investigating the impact of attentional state at encoding on subsequent memory performance and indicate a link between post-stimulus delays in attention-related RT and associative encoding success.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between individual differences in dual process and electrophysiological signatures of familiarity and recollection during retrieval 94%
- Recollection-related hippocampal fMRI effects predict longitudinal memory change in healthy older adults 93%
- Usefulness of a familiarity signal during recognition depends on test format: Neurocognitive evidence for a core assumption of the CLS framework 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Encoding-linked pupil response is modulated by expected and unexpected novelty: Implications for memory formation and neurotransmission 97%
- Positive and Neutral Updating Reconsolidate Aversive Episodic Memories via Different Routes 94%
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation at theta frequency to the parietal cortex impairs associative, but not perceptual, memory encoding 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- In for a pound, in for a penny: How the opportunity to gain reward influences the competition for memory resources 96%
- Memory for Individual Items is Related to Non-Reinforced Preference Change 94%
- Image memorability is predicted by discriminability and similarity in different stages of a convolutional neural network 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- When Gaze-Pattern Similarity May Interfere With Future Memory 95%
- Integrating memories: Congruency and reactivation aid memory integration through reinstatement of prior knowledge 93%
- Microstructural organization of Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus and Cingulum Bundle support metacognition driven cognitive offloading 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.