Back

Nitrate enhances anaerobic oxidation of methane in boreal lake sediments

Rissanen, A. J.; Jilbert, T.; Simojoki, A.; Mangayil, R.; Aalto, S. L.; Peura, S.; Jäntti, H.

2021-02-15 ecology
10.1101/2021.02.12.426818 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The identity of electron acceptors in promoting anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in the sediments of boreal lakes is currently unknown. Here, we studied the AOM rate of sediment slurries collected from three profundal stations of a nitrate-rich, oligo-mesotrophic, boreal lake (Lake Paajarvi, Finland), under varying nitrate concentrations using 13C-labelling. Furthermore, vertical profiles of the sediment and porewater geochemistry, and the microbial communities (16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing) were analyzed. Despite geochemical data indicating that simultaneous consumption of nitrate and methane took place at the sediment layers chosen for incubations, AOM rate was not enhanced by nitrate amendments at either of the stations. AOM rate was much higher at the shallow Station 1 (0.9-6.8 nmol C cm-3 d-1) with high contents of labile phytoplankton-derived organic matter, than at the deeper stations, Station 2 (0-0.3 nmol C cm-3 d-1) and 3 (0-0.2 nmol C cm-3 d-1). Accordingly, a higher relative abundance of methanotrophic archaea (Candidatus Methanoperedens) and bacteria (Methylococcales) were observed in the layers chosen for incubations at Station 1 than at the other stations. Besides nitrate, the geochemical profiles indicated that AOM was potentially coupled with iron or sulfate reduction at all stations. Furthermore, putative nitrite-reducing methanotrophs (Ca. Methylomirabilis) were the most abundant methanotrophs above the incubation layer at Station 2 and 3, which suggests that nitrite reduction also plays a role in driving AOM in the study lake. We conclude that AOM is not uniquely coupled to nitrate reduction in sediments of nitrate-rich, oligo-mesotrophic, boreal lakes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.