Back

COVID-19-related symptoms 6 months after the infection - Update on a prospective cohort study in Germany

Barbara Rauch; Stefanie Kern-Matschilles; Stefanie J. Haschka; Vanessa Sacco; Anne L. Potzel; Friederike Banning; Irina Benz; Mandy Meisel; Jochen Seissler; Christina Gar; Andreas Lechner

2021-02-13 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.02.12.21251619 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective Many anecdotal reports indicate the presence of &[prime]long COVID&[prime] - COVID-19-related symptoms weeks to months after the acute illness. However, frequency and symptom-pattern of &[prime]long COVID&[prime] in relation to acute disease severity are uncertain. As part of an ongoing, prospective cohort study we therefore conducted an online survey among adults 6 months after acute COVID-19. Methods The prospective online study Life&Covid is ongoing in Germany since May 2020. Participants were recruited 0 to 4 months after their SARS-CoV-2 infection und followed up by subsequent surveys. The survey 6 months after the infection was completed by 127 out of 148 individuals invited by email (86%). All grades of acute disease severity were included and 91% of the participants had been treated as outpatients during their acute illness. Results Six months after the infection, 67% of the study participants reported at least one symptom as a consequence of COVID-19. Exertional dyspnea (30% of participants), fatigue (25%) and diminished sense of taste/smell (19%) were the most common individual symptoms. At least one symptom, exertional dyspnea, and fatigue were reported more often after a severe acute illness, but diminished sense of taste/smell was unrelated to acute severity. Age group and sex did not associate with the frequency of symptoms at 6 months. Conclusions Based on this study, the prevalence of COVID-19-related symptoms 6 months after the infection is high. Some bias for overestimation may have affected this result. Nevertheless, &[prime]long COVID&[prime] requires attention in medical care and a better scientific understanding.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.