Back

Reconciling Inherent Interfacial Compatibility Conflict Enhances Adhesive Infiltration and Resolves Dentin Bonding Durability

Luo, Q.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Shu, C.; Li, Z.; Zhu, W.; Shen, Y.; Li, X.

2021-02-10 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.02.09.430396 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wet bonding is a basic technique used daily in clinics for tooth-restoration fixation. However, only 50% of the bonding lasts more than 5 years and thus patients must visit the dentists repeatedly. This is attributed to the limited infiltration of adhesives into the demineralized dentin (DD) matrix during wet-bonding. Herein, we show that reconciling interfacial compatibility conflict between the DD matrix and the critical hydrophobic adhesive molecules via hydrophobizing the DD matrix enables the adhesives to thoroughly infiltrate and uniformly distribute within the DD matrix. Thus, the bonding of the hydrophobic DD matrix using commercial dentin adhesives achieves the bonding strength 2-6 times higher than that of the non-treated DD matrix. When a hydrophobic adhesive is applied on the hydrophobic DD matrix, a flawless hybrid layer is produced as observed by nanoleakage investigation. A long-term bonding strength comes up to 7.3 fold that of the control group and very importantly, with no attenuation after 12 months. This study clarifies the basic cause of poor wet-bonding durability and demonstrates a paradigm in adhesive dentistry to overcome the long-existing bonding durability problem associated with inadequate adhesive infiltration into the DD matrix. This provides a new angle of view to resolve clinical dentin bonding durability problem and will significantly promote adhesive dentistry. HighlightsO_LIInherent interfacial compatibility conflict between demineralized dentin matrix and hydrophobic molecules of dentin adhesives is the basic cause for the dentin bonding durability problem. C_LIO_LIReconciling the interfacial compatibility conflict markedly facilitates adhesive infiltration in the demineralized dentin matrix and greatly enhances bonding effectiveness. C_LIO_LIHigh interfacial compatibility produces a flawless hybrid layer and ideal bonding effectiveness and durability. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=180 SRC="FIGDIR/small/430396v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (52K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9687e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b2fc79org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dd7379org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c8117b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG For wet bonding, poor infiltration of adhesives within the DD matrix inevitably produces numerous defects throughout the hybrid layer, which always leads to the failure of restoration. Via hydrophobizing the DD matrix, reconciling interfacial compatibility conflict between the DD matrix and the hydrophobic adhesive monomers overcomes durability problems associated with the infiltration of adhesives into the DD matrix producing a flawless hybrid layer and providing ideal bonding effectiveness and durability. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
5
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
6
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.8%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
12
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
14
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
19
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
21
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
24
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
25
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
26
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
28
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%