Back

An Incrementally Updatable and Scalable System for Large-Scale Sequence Search using LSM Trees

Almodaresi, F.; Khan, J.; Madaminov, S.; Pandey, P.; Ferdman, M.; Johnson, R.; Patro, R.

2021-02-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.02.05.429839 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationIn the past few years, researchers have proposed numerous indexing schemes for searching large databases of raw sequencing experiments. Most of these proposed indexes are approximate (i.e. with one-sided errors) in order to save space. Recently, researchers have published exact indexes--Mantis, VariMerge, and Bifrost--that can serve as colored de Bruijn graph representations in addition to serving as k-mer indexes. This new type of index is promising because it has the potential to support more complex analyses than simple searches. However, in order to be useful as indexes for large and growing repositories of raw sequencing data, they must scale to thousands of experiments and support efficient insertion of new data. ResultsIn this paper, we show how to build a scalable and updatable exact sequence-search index. Specifically, we extend Mantis using the Bentley-Saxe transformation to support efficient updates. We demonstrate Mantiss scalability by constructing an index of{approx} 40K samples from SRA by adding samples one at a time to an initial index of 10K samples. Compared to VariMerge and Bifrost, Mantis is more efficient in terms of index-construction time and memory, query time and memory, and index size. In our benchmarks, VariMerge and Bifrost scaled to only 5K and 80 samples, respectively, while Mantis scaled to more than 39K samples. Queries were over 24x faster in Mantis than in Bifrost (VariMerge does not immediately support general search queries we require). Mantis indexes were about 2.5x smaller than Bifrosts indexes and about half as big as VariMerges indexes. AvailabilityThe updatable Mantis implementation is available at https://github.com/splatlab/mantis/tree/mergeMSTs. Contactrob@cs.umd.edu Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available online.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.