Asigntf: Agnostic Signature Using Ntf: A Universal Agnostic Strategy To Estimate Cell-Types Abundance From Transcriptomic Datasets
Fogel, P.; Boldina, G.; Rocher, C.; Bettembourg, C.; Luta, G.; Auge, F.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSMolecular signatures for deconvolution of immune cell types have been proposed, based on a methodology that relies on the biological classification of the cell types being studied. When working with less known biological material, a data-driven approach is needed to uncover the underlying classes and construct ad hoc signatures. ResultsWe introduce a new approach, ASigNTF: Agnostic Signature using Non-negative Tensor Factorization, to perform the deconvolution of cell types from transcriptomics data (RNAseq and microarray). ASigNTF, which is based on two complementary statistical/mathematical tools: non-negative tensor factorization (for dimensionality reduction) and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (for signature selection), can be applied to any type of tissue as long as transcriptomic data on isolated cells is available. As a direct result of the new method, we propose two new signatures for the deconvolution of immune cell types, one consisting of a relatively small set of 415 genes, which is more compatible with microarray platforms, and a larger set of 915 genes. Using external datasets, our two signatures outperform the CIBERSORT LM22 signature in deconvolution of RNA-seq data. Our signature with 415 genes allows to recognize a larger number of cell types compared to the ABIS microarray signature. ConclusionsThe paper proposes a new method, ASigNTF; applies the method, and also provides a software implementation that allows to identify molecular signatures for deconvolution of complex tissues and specifically up to 16 immune cell types from micro-array or RNA-seq data. HO_SCPLOWIGHLIGHTSC_SCPLOWO_LISeveral signatures of immune cell types have been proposed, which follow a methodology deeply rooted in the known biological classification of the investigated cell types. C_LIO_LIWhen working with less known biological material, a more agnostic, data-driven approach is required to uncover the underlying classes and construct ad hoc signatures. C_LIO_LIWe present ASigNTF, a new agnostic approach to cell type classification and signature selection supported by an application software. C_LIO_LIWe discuss the results of benchmarking our proposed signatures, ABIS-seq and CIBERSORT on external datasets. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mcadet: a feature selection method for fine-resolution single-cell RNA-seq data based on multiple correspondence analysis and community detection 96%
- STREAK: A Supervised Cell Surface Receptor Abundance Estimation Strategy for Single Cell RNA-Sequencing Data using Feature Selection and Thresholded Gene Set Scoring 96%
- G2S3: a gene graph-based imputation method for single-cell RNA sequencing data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hierarchical cell-type identifier accurately distinguishes immune-cell subtypes enabling precise profiling of tissue microenvironment with single-cell RNA-sequencing 96%
- Molecular Group and Correlation Guided Structural Learning for Multi-Phenotype Prediction 96%
- SMNN: Batch Effect Correction for Single-cell RNA-seq data via Supervised Mutual Nearest Neighbor Detection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High tissue-specificity of lncRNAs maximises the prediction of tissue of origin of circulating DNA 95%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 95%
- Tensor decomposition- and principal component analysis-based unsupervised feature extraction to select more reasonable differentially expressed genes: Optimization of standard deviation versus state-of-art methods 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.