Investigating the impact of London's Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's health: Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL): Protocol for a prospective parallel cohort study
Colligan, G.; Tsocheva, I.; Scales, J.; Chavda, J.; Dove, R.; Kalsi, H.; Wood, H.; Cross, L.; Newby, C.; Hall, A.; Keating, M.; Petrovic, K.; Day, B.; Chrichlow, C.; Keighley, A.; Thomson, A.; Tomini, F.; Balkwill, F.; Mihaylova, B.; Grigg, J.; van Sluijs, E.; Fletcher, M.; Mon-Williams, M.; Wright, J.; Beevers, S.; Randhawa, G.; Eldridge, S.; Sheikh, A.; Gauderman, J.; Kelly, F.; Mudway, I. S.; Griffiths, C. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionAir pollution harms health across the life course. Children are at particular risk of adverse effects during development, which may impact on health in later life. Interventions that improve air quality are therefore urgently needed not only to improve public health now, but to prevent longer-term increased vulnerability to chronic disease. Low Emission Zones are a public health policy intervention aimed at reducing traffic-derived contributions to urban air pollution, but evidence that they deliver clear health benefits is lacking. We established a natural experiment design study (CHILL: Childrens Health in London and Luton) to evaluate the impacts of the introduction of Londons Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on childrens health. Methods and analysisCHILL is a prospective two-arm parallel longitudinal cohort study of children aged 6-9 years, attending primary schools in Central London (the focus of the first phase of the ULEZ) and Luton (a comparator site). The primary goal of the study is to examine the impact of changes in annual air pollutant exposures as oxides of nitrogen, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter less than 2.5microns and 10microns (NOx, NO2, PM2.5, PM10 respectively) across the two sites on lung growth, measured as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), over four consecutive years. Secondary outcomes being investigated include a range of respiratory health indicators as well as inequality and health economic measures. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been given by Queen Mary University of London Research Ethics Committee (ref 2018/08). Dissemination will target audiences through a variety of channels, including research papers, conference and media presentations, web summaries and social media. CHILL is funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research (Ref 16/139/09) with additional funding by Natural Environment Research Council, NIHR CLAHRC North Thames, NIHR ARC North Thames, and the Mayor of London. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04695093 Strengths and limitations of this studyO_ST_ABSStrengthsC_ST_ABSO_LICHILL uses a prospective parallel cohort design, allowing robust conclusions to be drawn on the impact of the ULEZ - a major city-wide air quality mitigation strategy - on air quality and childrens respiratory health. C_LIO_LICHILL study cohorts include children from large and ethnically diverse populations living in urban areas characterised by poor air quality. C_LI LimitationsO_LIAttrition of study cohort population over time, although this has been accounted for in the original design of the study. C_LIO_LIPotential diminution of the ULEZ air pollution signal due to pre-compliance with ULEZ restrictions in the run up to the introduction of the scheme in Central London on the 8th April 2019, and minor impacts of other pollution mitigation measures. C_LIO_LIAdded complexity of accounting for effects of COVID-19 and related lockdowns on traffic flows, air quality and childrens health. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Minimizing exposure to respiratory droplets, ‘jet riders’ and aerosols in air-conditioned hospital rooms by a ‘Shield-and-Sink’ strategy 91%
- Turning green: the impact of changing to more eco-friendly respiratory healthcare. A carbon and cost analysis of Dutch prescription data 91%
- Ventilation and detection of airborne SARS-CoV-2: elucidating high-risk spaces in naturally ventilated healthcare settings 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the impact of Hazelwood mine fire event on students’ educational development with Bayesian interrupted time-series hierarchical meta-regression 94%
- Rural Roads to Cognitive Resilience (RRR): A prospective cohort study protocol 93%
- Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and birth outcomes in a pregnancy cohort in Nairobi, Kenya. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Asthma hospitalisations and heat exposure in England: A case-crossover study during 2002-2019 93%
- Impact of banning smoking in cars with children on exposure to second-hand smoke: a natural experiment in England and Scotland 92%
- Aerosol emission from the respiratory tract: an analysis of relative risks from oxygen delivery systems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of Non-exhaust Emissions on the Asthmatic Airway (IONA) Protocol for a randomised three exposure crossover study 96%
- HIPTox – Hazard Identification Platform to Assess the Health Impacts from Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollutant Exposures, through Mechanistic Toxicology: A single-centre double-blind human exposure trial protocol 95%
- Short-term acute exposure to wildfire smoke and lung function in a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.