Back

A development guide for evaluating the maximum yield potential stage in barley

Thirulogachandar, V.; Schnurbusch, T.

2021-02-03 plant biology
10.1101/2021.02.02.429383 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining the grain yield potential contributed by grain number is a step towards advancing cereal crops yield. To achieve this aim, it is pivotal to recognize the maximum yield potential (MYP) of the crop. In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), the MYP is defined as the maximum spikelet primordia number of a spike. Previous barley studies often assumed the awn primordium (AP) stage as the MYP stage regardless of genotypes and growth conditions. From our spikelet-tracking experiments using the two-rowed cultivar Bowman, we found that the MYP stage can be different from the AP stage. Importantly, we find that the occurrence of inflorescence meristem (IM) deformation and its loss of activity coincided with the MYP stage, indicating the end of further spikelet initiation. Thus, we recommend validating the barley MYP stage with the IMs shape and propose this approach (named Spikelet Stop) for MYP staging. Following this approach, we compared the MYP stage and the MYP in 27 two- and six-rowed barley accessions grown in the greenhouse and field. Our results reveal that the MYP stage can be reached at various developmental stages, which majorly depend on the genotype and growth conditions. Furthermore, we found that two-rowed barleys MYP and the duration reaching the MYP stage may determine their yield potential. Based on our findings, we suggest key steps for the identification of the MYP in barley that can also be applied in a related crop such as wheat. HighlightWe show that the maximum yield potential stage in barley can be different from the awn primordium stage as proposed in earlier studies and it varies depending on the genotype and growth conditions. We suggest key steps to identify maximum yield potential in barley that might apply to related cereals.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.3%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.6%
3
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.2%
6
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.6%
14
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Plant Reproduction
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%