Back

COVID-19 infection and subsequent thromboembolism: A self-controlled case series analysis of a population cohort

Ho, F.; Man, K.; Toshner, M.; Celis-Morales, C.; Wong, I.; Sattar, N.; Pell, J.

2021-02-05 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2021.02.02.21251043
Show abstract

ObjectiveAn unexpectedly large number of people infected with Covid-19 had experienced a thrombotic event. This study aims to assess the associations between Covid-19 infection and thromboembolism including myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke, deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients and MethodsA self-controlled case-series study was conducted covering the whole of Scotlands general population. The study population comprised individuals with confirmed (positive test) Covid-19 and at least one thromboembolic event between March 2018 and October 2020. Their incidence rates during the risk interval (5 days before to 56 days after the positive test) and the control interval (the remaining periods) were compared intra-personally. ResultsAcross Scotland, 1,449 individuals tested positive for Covid-19 and experienced a thromboembolic event. The risk of thromboembolism was significantly elevated over the whole risk period but highest in the 7 days following the positive test (IRR 12.01, 95% CI 9.91-14.56) in all included individuals. The association was also present in individuals not originally hospitalised for Covid-19 (IRR 4.07, 95% CI 2.83-5.85). Risk of MI, stroke, PE and DVT were all significantly higher in the week following a positive test. The risk of PE and DVT was particularly high and remained significantly elevated even 56 days following the test. ConclusionConfirmed Covid-19 infection was associated with early elevations in risk with MI, ischaemic stroke, and substantially stronger and prolonged elevations with DVT and PE both in hospital and community settings. Clinicians should consider thromboembolism, especially PE, among people with Covid-19 in the community.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 14%
8.2%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 4%
7.5%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 59%
7.5%
6
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
9
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
10
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 65%
2.3%
12
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
14
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
17
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
18
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
25
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 26%
0.7%
26
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%