Quantifying meaningful adoption of a SARS-CoV-2 exposure notification app on the campus of the University of Arizona
Masel, J.; Shilen, A. N.; Helming, B. H.; Rutschman, J. D.; Windham, G. D.; Pogreba Brown, K.; Ernst, K.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo measure meaningful, local exposure notification usage without in-app analytics. MethodsWe surveyed app usage via case investigation interviews at the University of Arizona, with a focus on the period from September 9 to November 28, 2020, after automating the issuance of secure codes to verify positive test results. As independent validation, we compared the number of verification codes issued to the number of local cases. ResultsForty six percent (286/628) of infected persons interviewed by university case investigators reported having the app, and 55% (157/286) of these app users shared their positive SARS-CoV-2 test result in the app prior to the case investigation interview, comprising 25% (157/628) of those interviewed. This is corroborated by a 33% (565/1,713) ratio of code issuance (inflated by some unclaimed codes) to cases. Combining the 25% probability that those who test positive rapidly share their test result with a 46% probability that a person they infected can receive exposure notifications, an estimated 11.4% of transmission pairs exhibit meaningful app usage. High usage was achieved without the use of "push" notifications, in the context of a marketing campaign that leveraged social influencers. ConclusionsUsage can be assessed, without in-app analytics, within a defined local community such as a college campus rather than an entire jurisdiction. With marketing, high uptake in dense social networks like universities makes exposure notification an impactful complement to traditional contact tracing. Integrating verification code delivery into patient results portals was successful in making the exposure notification process rapid. 3 question summary box1) What is the current understanding of this subject?The extent to which exposure notification technology reduces SARS-CoV-2 transmission depends on usage among infected persons. 2) What does this report add to the literature?A novel metric estimates meaningful usage, and demonstrates potential transmission reduction on a college campus. Clear benefit was seen from simplifying verification of positive test results with automation. 3) What are the implications for public health practice?Defined communities can benefit from local deployment and marketing even in the absence of statewide deployment. Lifting current restrictions on deployment would allow more entities such as campuses to copy the model shown here to be successful.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of the SwissCovid digital proximity tracing app during the pandemic response: results for the Canton of Zurich 94%
- If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative 93%
- Control of COVID-19 transmission on an urban university campus during a second wave of the pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges for non-technical implementation of digital proximity tracing: early experiences from Switzerland 95%
- Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: Cross-country survey evidence 93%
- Improving Heart disease risk through quality-focused diet logging: pre-post study of a diet quality tracking app 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 90%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 90%
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.