Spatial integrated models foster complementarity between monitoring programs in producing large-scale ecological indicators
Lauret, V.; Labach, H.; Turek, D.; Laran, S.; Gimenez, O.
Show abstract
Over the last decades, large-scale ecological projects have emerged that require collecting ecological data over broad spatial and temporal coverage. Yet, obtaining relevant information about large-scale population dynamics from a single monitoring program is challenging, and often several sources of data, possibly heterogeneous, need to be integrated. In this context, integrated models combine multiple data types into a single analysis to quantify population dynamics of a targeted population. When working at large geographical scales, integrated spatial models have the potential to produce spatialised ecological estimates that would be difficult to obtain if data were analysed separately. In this paper, we illustrate how spatial integrated modelling offers a relevant framework for conducting ecological inference at large scales. Focusing on the Mediterranean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), we combined 21,464 km of photo-identification boat surveys collecting spatial capture-recapture data with 24,624 km of aerial line-transect following a distance-sampling protocol. We analysed spatial capture-recapture data together with distance-sampling data to estimate abundance and density of bottlenose dolphins. We compared the performances of the distance sampling model and the spatial capture-recapture model fitted independently, to our integrated spatial model. The outputs of our spatial integrated models inform bottlenose dolphin ecological status in the French Mediterranean Sea and provide ecological indicators that are required for regional scale ecological assessments like the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. We argue that integrated spatial models are widely applicable and relevant to conservation research and biodiversity assessment at large spatial scales.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for unobserved spatial variation in step selection analyses of animal movement via spatial random effects 95%
- Assessing predictive accuracy of species abundance models in dynamic systems 95%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling the effects of heterogeneity in space use on estimates of connectivity and population size: Insights from spatial capture-recapture modelling 95%
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors 94%
- Modelling Eurasian lynx populations in Western Europe: What prospects for the next 50 years? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 96%
- Bayesian areal disaggregation regression to predict wildlife distribution and relative density with low-resolution data 94%
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Life-history traits inform on population trends when assessing the conservation status of a declining tiger shark population 95%
- Integrating opportunistic and structured non-invasive surveys with spatial capture-recapture models to map connectivity of the Pyrenean brown bear population 95%
- Informing Extinction Risk: Summarizing Population Viability through a Meta-analysis of Multiple Long-term Monitoring Programs for a Declining Estuarine Fish Species 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.