Back

Sarilumab treatment of hospitalised patients with severe or critical COVID-19: a multinational, randomised, adaptive, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Lescure, F.-X.; Honda, H.; Fowler, R. A.; Sloane Lazar, J.; Shi, G.; Wung, P.; Patel, N.; Hagino, O.

2021-02-03 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.02.01.21250769 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundElevated proinflammatory cytokines have been associated with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severity. We assessed efficacy and safety of sarilumab, an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, in severe (requiring supplemental oxygen by nasal canula or face mask) or critical (requiring greater supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal support) COVID-19. MethodsThis was a 60-day, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial in patients hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and pneumonia, who required oxygen supplementation or intensive care. Patients were randomised 2:2:1 to intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was time to [≥]2-point clinical improvement (7-point scale; range: 1 [death] to 7 [not hospitalised]). The key secondary endpoint was proportion of patients alive at day 29. Safety outcomes included adverse events and laboratory assessments. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04327388). FindingsBetween March 28 and July 3, 2020, 420 patients were randomised; 416 received treatment (placebo, n=84; sarilumab 200 mg, n=159; sarilumab 400 mg, n=173). At day 29, there were no significant differences in median (95% CI) time to [≥]2-point improvement between placebo (12{middle dot}0 [9{middle dot}0-15{middle dot}0] days) and sarilumab groups (200 mg: 10{middle dot}0 [9{middle dot}0-12{middle dot}0] days, p=0.96, log-rank test; 400 mg: 10{middle dot}0 [9{middle dot}0-13{middle dot}0] days, p=0.34) or in proportions of patients alive (placebo, 91{middle dot}7%; sarilumab 200 mg, 89{middle dot}9%, p=0{middle dot}63; sarilumab 400 mg, 91{middle dot}9%, p=0{middle dot}85). At day 29, there were numerical, nonsignificant survival differences between sarilumab 400 mg (88%) and placebo (79%; difference +9%, 95% CI -7{middle dot}7 to 25{middle dot}5, p=0{middle dot}25) for critical patients. There were no unexpected safety signals. InterpretationThis trial did not demonstrate efficacy of sarilumab in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen. Adequately powered trials of targeted immunomodulatory therapies assessing survival as a primary endpoint are suggested in patients with critical COVID-19. FundingSanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
2
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
4
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.9%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%