Back

Expression and Manufacturing of Protein Therapeutics in Spirulina

Jester, B.; Zhao, H.; Gewe, M.; Adame, T.; Perruzza, L.; Bolick, D.; Agosti, J.; Khuong, N.; Kuestner, R.; Gamble, C.; Cruickshank, K.; Ferrara, J.; Lim, R.; Paddock, T.; Brady, C.; Ertel, S.; Zhang, M.; Tasch, M.; Saveria, T.; Doughty, D.; Marshall, J.; Carrieri, D.; Lee, J.; Goetsch, L.; Dang, J.; Sanjaya, N.; Fletcher, D.; Martinez, A.; Kadis, B.; Sigmar, K.; Afreen, E.; Nguyen, T.; Randolph, A.; Taber, A.; Krzeszowski, A.; Robinett, B.; Grassi, F.; Guerrant, R.; Spigarelli, M.; Takeuchi, R.; Finrow, B.; Behnke, C.; Roberts, J.

2021-01-27 molecular biology
10.1101/2021.01.25.427910 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arthrospira platensis (commonly known as spirulina) is a photosynthetic cyanobacterium1. It is a highly nutritious food that has been consumed for decades in the US, and even longer by indigenous cultures2. Its widespread use as a safe food source and proven scalability have driven frequent attempts to convert it into a biomanufacturing platform. But these were repeatedly frustrated by spirulinas genetic intractability. We report here efficient and versatile genetic engineering methodology for spirulina that allows stable expression of bioactive protein therapeutics at high levels. We further describe large-scale, indoor cultivation and downstream processing methods appropriate for the manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals in spirulina. The potential of the platform is illustrated by pre-clinical development and human testing of an orally delivered antibody therapeutic against campylobacter, a major cause of infant mortality in the developing world and a growing antibiotic resistance threat3,4. This integrated development and manufacturing platform blends the safety of food-based biotechnology with the ease of genetic manipulation, rapid growth rates and high productivity characteristic of microbial platforms. These features combine for exceptionally low-cost production of biopharmaceuticals to address medical needs that are unfeasible with current biotechnology platforms.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
22.9%
2
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.3%
3
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
5
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
13
ACS Catalysis
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.1%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
19
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
21
Bioconjugate Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Angewandte Chemie
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%