Back

Inspiratory muscle training for enhancing repeated-sprint ability: A pilot study

Rodriguez, R. F.; Aughey, R. J.; Billaut, F.; Townsend, N. E.

2021-01-22 physiology
10.1101/2021.01.22.427755 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This pilot study examined the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on repeated-sprint ability and vastus lateralis reoxygenation. Ten recreationally trained subjects were randomly divided into two groups to complete 4 weeks of IMT or Sham (placebo) training. Pre- and post-intervention, a repeated-sprint ability (RSA) test was performed in both normoxia and hypoxia (FiO2 {approx} 14.5%). Vastus lateralis reoxygenation (VLreoxy), defined as peak to minimum amplitude deoxyhaemoglobin for each sprint/recovery cycle, was assessed during all trials using near-infrared spectroscopy. For total work performed, power analysis revealed that for small, medium and large effects (Cohens f), sample sizes of n = 8, 16 and 90 respectively, are required to achieve a power of 80% at an level of 0.05. Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure increased in IMT by 36.5%, 95% CI [20.9, 61.6] and by 2.7%, 95% CI [-4.46, 8.8] in Sham. No clear difference in the change of work completed during the sprints between groups were observed in normoxia (Sham -0.805 kJ, 95% CI [-3.92, 0.39]; IMT -2.06 kJ, 95% CI [-11.5, 4.96]; P = 0.802), or hypoxia (Sham -3.09 kJ, 95% CI [-7, 0.396]; IMT 0.354 kJ, 95% CI [-1.49, 2.1]; P = 0.802). VLreoxy in IMT increased by 9.34%, 95% CI [5.15, 13.7] in normoxia only. In conclusion, despite a large increase in IMT, this was only associated with a small effect on RSA in our pilot study cohort. Owing to a potentially relevant impact of training the inspiratory musculature, future studies should include a sample size of at least 16-20 to detect moderate to large effects on RSA.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.