Back

Psychiatric, Emotional, and Brain Volumetric Footprints of Childhood Conduct in Healthy Young Adults

Abdolalizadeh, A.; Moradi, K.; Dabbagh Ohadi, M. A.; Mirfazeli, F. S.; Rajimehr, R.

2021-01-26 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2021.01.20.21250107 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundConduct Disorder (CD) is defined as aggressive, antisocial, and rule-breaking behavior during childhood, and a major risk factor for developing an antisocial personality disorder. However, nearly half the patients develop into seemingly normal status. We aimed to identify psychiatric, emotional, and brain volumetric and functional footprints of childhood CD in healthy young adults with a prior history of CD. Methods40 subjects with a prior history of CD (CC) and 1166 control subjects (HC) were identified from the Human Connectome Project. Their psychiatric, emotional, impulsivity, and personality traits were extracted. An emotion task fMRI activation of amygdala and hippocampus, as well as whole-brain and hippocampal/amygdalar segmentation volumetry were analyzed. We then statistically assessed the between-group differences and associations between the assessments and the hippocampal or amygdala nuclei measurements. ResultsAfter correcting for multiple comparisons, we found higher anger aggression, antisocial personality problems, aggressive and rule-breaking behaviors, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity, intrusive, externalizing, neuroticism, and lower agreeableness in the CC group. The neuroimaging analysis also revealed larger subregions of the left hippocampus in CC group. Significant group x assessment association was found for aggression and left hippocampal presubiculum and basal nuclei of left amygdala. DiscussionHealthy young adults with a prior history of CD still exhibit some forms of antisocial-like behavior, without evidence of emotional recognition disturbances, and with larger left hippocampal subregions. These larger hippocampal and amygdala volumes may play a protective role in CC subjects.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.