Deficient hand washing facilities in public toilets in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey in one high-income country
Wilson, N.; Thomson, G.
Show abstract
AimsTo identify the extent of the provision of water and soap for hand washing in public toilets at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. To also make comparisons with a pre-pandemic survey that included a sample of the same facilities. MethodsWe collected data from 400 toilets that were open to the public; all those in three contiguous city council territories (228) and a further convenience sample of 172 around the rest of New Zealand. Comparisons were made with the data on the same facilities included in a 2012/2013 survey. ResultsFor all the toilets in this survey, 2.5% had no water for hand washing and 14.8% had no soap. There was COVID-19 related health messaging signage in 19.5% of toilets, with posters of the COVID-19 QR code used to facilitate contact tracing in 12.3%, and generic hand washing signage in 1.8%. The hand washing water had "no touch" activation at 28.0% of toilets and at 18.5% for toilet bowl flushing. Toilet bowl lids were not present at 32.8%, and 2.3% of toilets had damage which would impair their functionality (eg, broken toilet seats). For the 128 sites that had also been examined in the previous survey, this new survey found significantly increased provision of soap (risk ratio = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.25 to 1.72), but no increased provision of water. ConclusionsDespite the serious threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of hand washing facilities in public toilets sampled required tap touching, and did not have health messaging. Nevertheless there has been some modest improvements in soap (but not water) provision since the previous survey eight years before.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a sanitation intervention on quality of life and mental wellbeing in low-income urban neighbourhoods of Maputo, Mozambique 94%
- Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: A qualitative study of university students and staff 93%
- COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto’s Pearson Airport 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 94%
- Within-country heterogeneity in patterns of social contact relevant for tuberculosis infection transmission, prevention, and care 93%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opinions of Former Jail Residents about Self-collection of SARS-CoV-2 Specimens, Paired with Wastewater Surveillance: A Qualitative Study Rapidly Examining Acceptability of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures 94%
- Comprehensive profiling of social mixing patterns in resource poor countries: a mixed methods research protocol 93%
- Community health worker knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: learnings from an online cross-sectional survey using a digital health platform, UpSCALE, in Mozambique 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 92%
- Geographic barriers to establishing a successful hospital referral system in rural Madagascar 92%
- Measuring Oxygen Access: lessons from health facility assessments in Nigeria 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Project ITCH: Cross-sectional surveys to understand residential vector control attitudes and practices across New England 92%
- Ongoing symptoms and functional impairment 12 weeks after testing positive to SARS-CoV-2 or influenza in Australia: an observational cohort study 89%
- Food Deserts and Food Insecurity in Indian Medical Colleges: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Myths and Realities 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.