Back

COVID-19 in 823 Transplant patients: A Systematic Scoping Review

Emara, M. M.; Elsedeiq, M.; Elmorshedi, M.; Neamatallah, H.; Abdelkhalek, M.; Yassen, A.; Nabhan, A.

2021-01-20 transplantation
10.1101/2021.01.18.21250025 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundManagement of COVID-19 in transplant patients is a big challenge. Data on immunosuppression management, clinical picture, and outcomes are lacking. ObjectivesTo summarize the current literature on COVID-19 in transplant patients especially the data regarding the immunosuppression protocols, clinical presentation, and outcomes. Search strategyA systematic search of MEDLINE, EBSCO, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LitCovid, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases. The references of the relevant studies were also searched. The search was last updated on June 3, 2020. Selection CriteriaPrimary reports of solid organ transplant patients who developed COVID-19. An overlap of cases in different reports was checked. Data collection and analysisA descriptive summary of immunosuppression therapy (before and after COVID-19), clinical presentation (symptoms, imaging, laboratory, and disease severity), management (oxygen therapy, antiviral, and antibacterial), major outcomes (Intensive care admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury), and mortality. Main resultsWe identified 74 studies reporting 823 cases of solid organ transplantation with COVID-19. Among 372 patients, 114 (30.6%) were mild COVID-19, 101 (27.2%) moderate, and 157 (42.2%) severe or critical. Major outcomes included intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation, and acute kidney injury, which occurred in 121 (14.7%), 97 (11.8%), and 63 (7.7%) of patients, respectively. Mortality was reported in 160 (19.4%) patients. Missing individual data hindered making clinical correlations. ConclusionCOVID-19 in solid organ transplant patients probably has a more disease severity, worse major outcomes (Intensive care admission, invasive ventilation, acute kidney injury), and higher mortality than in non-transplant patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%