Back

Standardized quality control workflow to evaluate the reproducibility and differentiation potential of human iPSCs into neurons

Chen, C. X.- Q.; Abdian, N.; Maussion, G.; Thomas, R. A.; Demirova, I.; Cai, E.; Tabatabaei, M.; Beitel, L. K.; Karamchandani, J.; Fon, E. A.; Durcan, T. M.

2021-01-14 cell biology
10.1101/2021.01.13.426620 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from human somatic cells have created new opportunities to generate disease-relevant cells. Thus, as the use of patient-derived stem cells has become more widespread, having a workflow to monitor each line is critical. This ensures iPSCs pass a suite of quality control measures, promoting reproducibility across experiments and between labs. With this in mind, we established a multistep workflow to assess our newly generated iPSCs for variations and reproducibility relative to each other and iPSCs obtained from external sources. Our benchmarks for evaluating iPSCs include examining iPSC morphology and proliferation in two different media conditions and evaluating their ability to differentiate into each of the three germ layers, with a particular focus on neurons. Genomic integrity in the human iPSCs was analyzed by G-band karyotyping and a qPCR-based test for the detection of hotspot mutations test. Cell-line identity was authenticated by Short Tandem Repeat (STR) analysis. Using standardized dual SMAD inhibition methods, all iPSC lines gave rise to neural progenitors that could subsequently be differentiated into cortical neurons. Neural differentiation was analyzed qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by qPCR for progenitor, neuronal, cortical, and glial markers. Taken together, we present a multistep quality control workflow to evaluate variability and reproducibility across and between iPSCs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
4
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
23
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
26
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
30
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%