Back

A stochastic process modelling of maize phyllochron enables to characterize environmental and genetic effects.

Plancade, S.; Marchadier, E.; Huet, S.; Ressayre, A.; Nous, C.; Dillmann, C.

2021-01-12 plant biology
10.1101/2021.01.11.426247 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The times between appearance of successive leaves or phyllochron characterize the vegetative development of annual plants. Hypothesis testing models, which enables to compare phyllochron between genetic groups or conditions, are usually based on regression of thermal time on the number of leaves, most of the time assuming a constant leaf appearance rate. However these models are both statistically biased and inappropriate in terms of modelling. We propose a stochastic process model in which the emergence of new leaves is considered as successive time-to-events, which provides a flexible and more accurate modelling as well as unbiased testing procedures. The model was applied on an original maize dataset collected in fields for three years on plants originating from two divergent selection experiments for flowering time conducted in two maize inbred lines. We showed that the main differences in phyllochron were not observed between selection populations (Early or Late), but rather between ancestral lines, years of experimentation, and leaf ranks. Our results highlight a strong departure from the assumption of a constant leaf appearance rate in one year that could be related to climate variations, even if the impact of each climatic variables individually was not clearly elucidated.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.4%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.7%
3
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
4
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
6
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
8
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
9
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
11
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
13
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
15
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
1.0%
20
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%