Is earlier reproduction associated with higher or lower survival? Antagonistic results between individual and population scales in the blue tit
Bastianelli, O.; Charmantier, A.; Biard, C.; Bonamour, S.; Teplitsky, C.; Robert, A.
Show abstract
Although it has been shown that phenology can respond to temporal environmental variation in free ranging populations of several species, little is known about the mechanisms of these responses and their effects on demography, and in particular on survival. Exploring phenological responses and their associated consequences on survival can be achieved at two distinct scales: the population scale, which focusses on a set of common responses to environmental conditions, and the individual scale, focusing on the relative position of each individual in the distribution of survival and phenology under particular conditions. In this study, we apply capture-mark-recapture multistate modelling on a 38-year monitoring dataset of blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) to investigate the effects of breeding phenology and some demographic covariates (breeding density, average and individual breeding success) on adult survival, at both population and individual scales. Our analysis revealed that (i) at the population scale, early breeding years are followed by lower average adult survival. (ii) At the individual level, earlier breeders within the population have higher subsequent survival than later breeders, although this relationship is reversed in years with very harsh conditions, e.g. warm spring and high breeding density. (iii) High individual relative breeding success is also associated with higher subsequent survival and explains more survival variation than relative phenology. Overall, our study indicates that, although earlier breeding is associated with a survival cost at the population level, substantial intrapopulation hererogeneity shapes a positive association between earlier breeding, breeding success and survival at the individual level.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying drivers of spatio-temporal variation in survival in four blue tit populations 98%
- Bimodal breeding phenology in the parsley frog Pelodytes punctatus as a bet-hedging strategy in an unpredictable environment despite strong priority effects 96%
- Four decades of phenology in an alpine amphibian: trends, stasis, and climatic drivers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Territory acquisition mediates the influence of predators and climate on juvenile red squirrel survival 94%
- Flexible parental care in a songbird correlates with sex-specific responses to seasonal phenology, mating opportunity and reproductive success 93%
- Unravelling processes between phenotypic plasticity and population dynamics in migratory birds 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Partitioning variance in reproductive success, within years and across lifetimes 95%
- Modeling the demography of species providing extended parental care: A capture-recapture multievent model with a case study on Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) 94%
- To what extent can life history strategies inform species conservation planning? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Substantial intraspecific variation in energy budgets: biology or artefact? 94%
- Differential early-life survival underlies the adaptive significance of temperature-dependent sex determination in a long-lived reptile 93%
- Narrow oviposition preference of an insect herbivore risks survival under conditions of severe drought 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Good moms: dependent-young and their mothers cope better than others with longer dry season in plains zebras 96%
- Exploring the role of life history traits and introduction effort in understanding invasion success in mammals: A case study of Barbary ground squirrels 94%
- Inferring condition in wild mammals: body condition indices confer no benefit over measuring body mass across ecological contexts 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.