Recovery of high-quality assembled genomes via single-cell genome-guided binning of metagenome assembly
Arikawa, K.; Ide, K.; Kogawa, M.; Saeki, T.; Yoda, T.; Endoh, T.; Matsuhashi, A.; Takeyama, H.; Hosokawa, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundObtaining high-quality (HQ) reference genomes from microbial communities is crucial for understanding the phylogeny and function of uncultured microbes in complex microbial ecosystems. Despite the improved bioinformatic approaches to generate curated metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), existing metagenomic binners often fail to obtain reliable MAGs, and thus, they are nowhere comparable to genomes sequenced from isolates in terms of strain level resolution. Here, we present a single-cell genome-guided metagenome binning (MetaSAG) to reconstruct the strain-resolved genomes from microbial communities at once. ResultsMetaSAG employs single-cell amplified genomes (SAGs) generated with microfluidic technology as binning guides to recover improved draft genomes with the metagenomic data. To assess the performance of reconstructing genomes from various microbial communities, we compared MetaSAG with four conventional metagenomic binners using a cell mock community, human gut microbiota, and skin microbiota samples. MetaSAG showed precise contig binning and higher recovery rates (>97%) of rRNA and plasmids compared to conventional binners in genome reconstruction from the cell mock community. In human microbiota samples, MetaSAG recovered the largest number of genomes with a total of 103 gut microbial genomes (21 HQ and 65 showed >90% completeness) and 45 skin microbial genomes (10 HQ and 40 showed >90% completeness), respectively. Conventional binners recovered one Staphylococcus hominis genome, whereas MetaSAG recovered two S. hominis genomes from the identical skin microbiota sample. Single-cell sequencing indicated that these S. hominis genomes clearly derived from two distinct strains harboring specifically different plasmids. We found that all conventional S. hominis MAGs had substantial lack or excess of the genome sequences and contamination of other Staphylococcus bacteria (S. epidermidis). ConclusionsMetaSAG enabled us to obtain the strain-resolved genomes in the mock community and human microbiota samples by assigning metagenomic sequences correctly and covering both highly conserved genes such as rRNA genes and unique extrachromosomal elements, including plasmids. MetaSAG will provide HQ genomes that are difficult to obtain with metagenomic analyses alone and will facilitate the understanding of microbial ecosystems by elucidating detailed metabolic pathways and horizontal gene transfer networks through microbial genomes. MetaSAG is available at https://github.com/kojiari/metasag.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal, Multi-platform Metagenomics Yields a High-quality Genomic Catalog and Guides an In Vitro Model for Cheese Communities 96%
- BiG-MAP: an automated pipeline to profile metabolic gene cluster abundance and expression in microbiomes 96%
- Illumina Complete Long Read Assay yields contiguous bacterial genomes from human gut metagenomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Single Amplified Genome Catalog Reveals the Dynamics of Mobilome and Resistome in the Human Microbiome 97%
- BinaRena: a dedicated interactive platform for human-guided exploration and binning of metagenomes 96%
- Altitude-dependent agro-ecologies impact the microbiome diversity of scavenging indigenous chicken in Ethiopia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput single-cell isolation of Bifidobacterium strains from the gut microbiome 95%
- Utilizing co-abundances of antimicrobial resistance genes to identify potential co-selection in the resistome 95%
- Evaluating de novo assembly and binning strategies for time-series drinking water metagenomes. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.