Transcriptomics provides a genetic signature of vineyard site with insight into vintage-independent regional wine characteristics
Reiter, T.; Montpetit, R.; Byer, S.; Frias, I.; Leon, E.; Viano, R.; Mcloughlin, M.; Halligan, T.; Hernandez, D.; Figueroa-Balderas, R.; Cantu, D.; Steenwerth, K.; Runnebaum, R.; Montpetit, B.
Show abstract
In wine fermentations, the metabolic activity of both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces organisms impact wine chemistry. Ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing of grape musts has demonstrated that microorganisms occur non-randomly and are associated with the vineyard of origin, suggesting a role for the vineyard, grape, and wine microbiome in shaping wine fermentation outcomes. We used ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing of grape must and RNA sequencing of primary fermentations to profile fermentations from 15 vineyards in California and Oregon across two vintages. We find that the relative abundance of fungal organisms detected by ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing did not correlate with transcript abundance from those organisms within the RNA sequencing data, suggesting that the majority of the fungi detected in must by ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing are not active during these inoculated fermentations. Additionally, we detect genetic signatures of vineyard site and region during fermentation that are predictive for each vineyard site, identifying nitrogen, sulfur, and thiamine metabolism as important factors for distinguishing vineyard site and region. ImportanceThe wine industry generates billions of dollars of revenue annually, and economic productivity is in part associated with regional distinctiveness of wine sensory attributes. Microorganisms associated with grapes and wineries are influenced by region of origin, and given that some microorganisms play a role in fermentation, it is thought that microbes may contribute to the regional distinctiveness of wine. We show that while the presence of microbial DNA is associated with wine region and vineyard site, the presence of microbial DNA is not associated with gene expression of those microorganisms during fermentation. We further show that detected gene expression signatures associated with wine region and vineyard site provide a means to address differences in fermentations that may drive regional distinctiveness.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene expression during fermentation of Pinot noir wines at industrially relevant scale 98%
- Genomic Adaptation Of An Autochthonous Cider Yeast Strain To Buckwheat And Barley Wort Under Stressful Brewing Conditions 96%
- Does strain-level persistence of lactobacilli in long term back-slopped sourdoughs inform on domestication of food-fermenting lactic acid bacteria? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomics and synthetic community experiments uncover the key metabolic roles of acetic acid bacteria in sourdough starter microbiomes 96%
- Strain-level diversity impacts cheese rind microbiome assembly and function 95%
- Hyperdiverse, bioactive, and interaction-specific metabolites produced only in co-culture suggest diverse competitors may fuel secondary metabolism of xylarialean fungi 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping global shifts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene expression across asynchronous time trajectories with diffusion maps 99%
- The genome of the CTG(Ser1) yeast Scheffersomyces stipitis is plastic 93%
- Intra-species transcriptional profiling reveals key regulators of Candida albicans pathogenic traits 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbial communities in retail draft beers and the biofilms they produce 96%
- Diversity in Chemical Subunits and Linkages: A Key Molecular Determinant of Microbial Richness, Microbiota Interactions, and Substrate Utilization 94%
- Nitrogenous Compound Utilization and Production of Volatile Organic Compounds among Commercial Wine Yeasts Highlight Strain-Specific Metabolic Diversity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.