Back

A Self-Supervised Machine Learning Approach for Objective Live Cell Segmentation and Analysis

Robitaille, M. C.; Byers, J. M.; Christodoulides, J. A.; Raphael, M. P.

2021-01-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.01.07.425773 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Machine learning algorithms hold the promise of greatly improving live cell image analysis by way of (1) analyzing far more imagery than can be achieved by more traditional manual approaches and (2) by eliminating the subjective nature of researchers and diagnosticians selecting the cells or cell features to be included in the analyzed data set. Currently, however, even the most sophisticated model based or machine learning algorithms require user supervision, meaning the subjectivity problem is not removed but rather incorporated into the algorithms initial training steps and then repeatedly applied to the imagery. To address this roadblock, we have developed a self-supervised machine learning algorithm that recursively trains itself directly from the live cell imagery data, thus providing objective segmentation and quantification. The approach incorporates an optical flow algorithm component to self-label cell and background pixels for training, followed by the extraction of additional feature vectors for the automated generation of a cell/background classification model. Because it is self-trained, the software has no user-adjustable parameters and does not require curated training imagery. The algorithm was applied to automatically segment cells from their background for a variety of cell types and five commonly used imaging modalities - fluorescence, phase contrast, differential interference contrast (DIC), transmitted light and interference reflection microscopy (IRM). The approach is broadly applicable in that it enables completely automated cell segmentation for long-term live cell phenotyping applications, regardless of the input imagerys optical modality, magnification or cell type.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
2
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
5
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
6
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
16
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
18
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%