Back

The ocular tissue-specificity of differentially expressed age-related macular degeneration associated genes

Duchen, D.; Beaty, T. H.

2021-01-04 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.12.28.20248962 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness in the developed world. One of the most genetically well-characterized degenerative diseases, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 52 independent common or rare AMD risk associated variants. While transcriptome-wide association analyses (TWAS) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) efforts have characterized the effects of these AMD-associated genes on mRNA expression in retinal tissue, we aimed to characterize the AMD-associated transcriptional profiles of functionally distinct ocular tissues including the macular and extramacular regions of the retina and the retinal-pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid. MethodsUsing publicly available microarray data (NCBI GEO accession: GSE29801) comprised of retinal and RPE/choroidal tissue samples from 142 AMD patients and 151 healthy individuals (118 retina and 175 RPE/Choroid samples), tissue-specific differential gene expression analyses were conducted. Transcriptome analyses were focused on 878 genes surrounding known AMD-associated loci. ResultsMany genes which contain clinically significant or causal variants identified via GWAS or TWAS/eQTL studies were significantly differentially expressed and display transcriptional heterogeneity across different subtypes of ocular tissue and retinal geography in AMD-associated tissues. ConclusionThese findings demonstrate the importance of spatial heterogeneity and tissue specificity in the mRNA expression of known AMD-associated genes. Genes known to harbor rare or causal AMD- associated variants are differentially expressed in functionally distinct ocular tissues of AMD patients, suggesting they might contribute to disease regardless of mutation status.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.