Experiences with Primary Care in the State of Utah for Gender Diverse People: Surveying the Difficulties in Accessing Healthcare
Tristani-Firouzi, B.; Rolls, J.; Mihalopoulos, N. L.; Agarwal, C. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundTransgender and non-binary communities continue to be underserved in healthcare. This study seeks to better understand the barriers and difficulties faced by transgender and non-binary patients in accessing primary care and hormone therapy in Utah. MethodsAn online survey was developed for transgender and non-binary identifying adults and was advertised via social media and the University of Utah Hospitals website. ResultsThere were 123 respondents from Utah including 39 trans women, 49 trans men, and 35 non-binary individuals. The age ranged from 18-67 (average 30 years), and 93% were Caucasian. The majority (84%) were insured, yet 67% of respondents reported difficulty accessing primary care. Fear of discrimination and being unable to find trans-friendly providers were reported as the two largest barriers. Non-binary respondents reported fear of discrimination as a barrier to primary care at the highest percentage (92%). Nearly 3 in 4 respondents who have hormone therapy reported difficulty paying for it. One in four trans women reported accessing hormones online or from a friend. ConclusionUtah is currently drastically underequipped to provide for the healthcare needs of transgender and non-binary communities. There needs to be an increase in trans-friendly primary care providers to curb discrimination. More resources and efforts must go into training primary care providers with necessary knowledge to properly serve transgender and non-binary patients. Finally, clear anti-discrimination laws are needed for insurance companies to reduce the financial barrier to transgender health services in Utah.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 95%
- Couple-Centered HIV Prevention and Care: Endorsement, Practice and Uncertainty among US Healthcare Providers in Western-Central Upstate New York 94%
- Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among Black women: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis 93%
- Factors associated with contraceptive use among reproductive-age women during a pandemic: Evidence from a small developing state 92%
- Facilitators and barriers to contraception access and use for Hispanic American adolescent women: An integrative literature review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perspectives and Recommendations from Hospitalized Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Qualitative Study 92%
- “This is about the coolest thing I’ve ever seen is that you just showed right up.” COVID-19 testing and vaccine acceptability among homeless-experienced adults: Qualitative data from two samples 91%
- Black women in medical education publishing: Bibliometric and testimonio accounts using intersectionality methodology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 92%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 92%
- Developing the PATH-GP (Prevention and Testing for HIV in General Practice) intervention: a Person-Based Approach intervention development study to increase HIV testing and PrEP access. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 94%
- The mental health and experiences of discrimination of LGBTQ+ people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings from the Queerantine Study 92%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.