Back

GAIT-GM: Galaxy tools for modeling metabolite changes as a function of gene expression

McIntyre, L.; Huertas-Lopez, F. V.; Moskalenko, O.; Morse, A.; Conesa, A.

2020-12-27 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.12.25.424407 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Galaxy is a user-friendly platform with a strong development community and a rich set of tools for omics data analysis. While multi-omics experiments are becoming popular, tools for multi-omics data analysis are poorly represented in this platform. Here we present GAIT-GM, a set of new Galaxy tools for integrative analysis of gene expression and metabolomics data. In the Annotation Tool, features are mapped to KEGG pathway using a text mining approach to increase the number of mapped metabolites. Several interconnected databases are used to maximally map gene IDs across species. In the Integration Tool, changes in metabolite levels are modelled as a function of gene expression in a flexible manner. Both unbiased exploration of relationships between genes and metabolites and biologically informed models based on pathway data are enabled. The GAIT-GM tools are freely available at https://github.com/SECIMTools/gait-gm.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Metabolites
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of Proteome Research
● 234 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.3%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.9%
7
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Molecular Omics
◐ 23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
11
Nature Protocols
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
14
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Metabolomics
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.