Back

Mapping the probability of forest snowdisturbances in Finland

Suvanto, S.; Lehtonen, A.; Nevalainen, S.; Lehtonen, I.; Viiri, H.; Strandström, M.; Peltoniemi, M.

2020-12-24 ecology
10.1101/2020.12.23.424139 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The changing forest disturbance regimes emphasize the need for improved damage risk information. Here, our aim was to (1) improve the current understanding of snow damage risks by assessing the importance of abiotic factors, particularly the modelled snow load on trees, versus forest properties in predicting the probability of snow damage, (2) produce a snow damage probability map for Finland. We also compared the results for winters with typical snow load conditions and a winter with exceptionally heavy snow loads. To do this, we used damage observations from the Finnish national forest inventory (NFI) to create a statistical snow damage occurrence model, spatial data layers from different sources to use the model to predict the damage probability for the whole country in 16 x 16 m resolution. Snow damage reports from forest owners were used for testing the final map. Our results showed that best results were obtained when both abiotic and forest variables were included in the model. However, in the case of the high snow load winter, the model with only abiotic predictors performed nearly as well as the full model and the ability of the models to identify the snow damaged stands was higher than in other years. The results showed patterns of forest adaptation to high snow loads, as spruce stands in the north were less susceptible to damage than in southern areas and long-term snow load reduced the damage probability. The model and the derived wall-to-wall map were able to discriminate damage from no-damage cases on a good level. The damage probability mapping approach identifies the drivers of snow disturbances across forest landscapes and can be used to spatially estimate the current and future disturbance risks in forests, informing practical forestry and decision-making and supporting the adaptation to the changing disturbance regimes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
13
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
14
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
20
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%