Risk factors for community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. A cross-sectional study in 116,678 people.
Kjetland, E. F.; Kalleberg, K. T.; Soraas, C. L.; Hammarstrom, B.; Myklebust, T. A.; Jenum, S.; Axelsen, E.; Lind, A.; Bevre-Jensen, R.; Jorgensen, S. B.; Pettersen, F. O.; Solberg, L. B.; Hadley, C. L.; Istre, M. S.; Liestol, K.; Dahl, J. A.; Ursin, G.; Soraas, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission are not well characterised in Western populations. We sought to identify potential risk factors for transmission and actionable information to prevent for SARS-CoV-2. MethodsIndividuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 at four major laboratories were invited. In addition, participants were sampled by convenience after a media campaign. Self-reported test results were compared with laboratory results, demographic data and behavioural facts were collected using a digital platform. In a cross-sectional design positive cases were compared with negative and untested control groups. FindingsApproximately 14 days after a countrywide lockdown in Norway, 116,678 participants were included. Median age was 46 years, 44% had children in preschool or in school; 18% were practicing health professionals. International flights, contact with infected, and gatherings of more than 50 people, were associated with high risk. Health professionals who used public transport were at higher risk of testing positive than those who did not. Having undergone light infections, the last six months was strongly associated with lower odds ratio of SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Contact with children, use of hand sanitiser and use of protective gloves in private were also associated with lower odds ratio of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. InterpretationFurther research is needed to explore if being a parent or looking after children is associated with lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the next phases of the pandemic. Immunological research should be done to determine the effects of prior trivial infections on SARS-CoV-2 infection. We confirm that large gatherings during the pandemic should be avoided and those who are infected, or under suspicion thereof, posed very high risks to others this population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A test-negative case-control study with additional population controls 95%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 95%
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation in children and adolescents in Norway: A nationwide population-based study. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care use up to 6 months after COVID-19 in 700.000 children and adolescents: a pre-post study 95%
- Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 over distances greater than two metres: a rapid systematic review 93%
- Risk Of Hospitalisation With COVID-19 Among Teachers Compared To Healthcare Workers And Other Working-Age Adults. A Nationwide Case-Control Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-Cov-2 prevalence, transmission, health-related outcomes and control strategies in homeless shelters: systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in care homes affected by COVID-19; a prospective cohort study in England 92%
- Rehabilitation needs and mortality associated with the Covid-19 pandemic: a population-based study of all hospitalised and home-healthcare individuals in a Swedish healthcare region 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of RT-PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection at schools: First results from the Austrian School-SARS-CoV-2 Study 93%
- Extremely high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a strictly-Orthodox Jewish community in the UK 92%
- Workplace Contact Patterns in England during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.