Back

Untangling structural factors and evolutionary drivers in nascent polyploids

Ferreira de Carvalho, J.; Stoeckel, S.; Eber, F.; Lode-Taburel, M.; Gilet, M.-M.; Trotoux, G.; Morice, J.; Falentin, C.; Chevre, A.-M.; Rousseau-Gueutin, M.

2020-12-22 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.12.21.423805 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIAllopolyploids have globally higher fitness than their diploid progenitors however, by comparison, most resynthesized allopolyploids have poor fertility and highly unstable genome. Elucidating the evolutionary processes promoting genome stabilization and fertility is thus essential to comprehend allopolyploid success. C_LIO_LIUsing the Brassica model, we mimicked the speciation process of a nascent allopolyploid species by resynthesizing allotetraploid B. napus and systematically selecting for euploid individuals over eight generations in four independent allopolyploidization events with contrasted genetic backgrounds, cytoplasmic donors and polyploid formation type. We evaluated the evolution of meiotic behavior, fertility and identified rearrangements in S1 to S9 lineages, to explore the positive consequences of euploid selection on B. napus genome stability. C_LIO_LIRecurrent selection of euploid plants for eight generations drastically reduced the percentage of aneuploid progenies as early as the fourth generation, concomitantly with a quasi disappearance of newly fixed homoeologous rearrangements. The consequences of homoeologous rearrangements on meiotic behavior and seed number strongly depended on the genetic background and cytoplasm donor. C_LIO_LIThe combined use of both self-fertilisation and outcrossing as well as recurrent euploid selection, allowed identification of genomic regions associated with fertility and meiotic behavior, providing complementary evidence to explain B. napus speciation success. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.