Prioritizing Risk Groups for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination "By the Numbers"
McDonald, C. J.; Baik, S. H.; Zheng, Z.; Amos, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundGiven the limited supply of two COVID-19 vaccines, it will be important to choose which risk groups to prioritize for vaccination in order to get the most health benefits from that supply. MethodIn order to help decide how to get the maximum health yield from this limited supply, we implemented a logistic regression model to predict COVID-19 death risk by age, race, and sex and did the same to predict COVID-19 case risk. ResultsOur predictive model ranked all demographic groups by COVID-19 death risk. It was highly concentrated in some demographic groups, e.g. 85+ year old Black, Non-Hispanic patients suffered 1,953 deaths per 100,000. If we vaccinated the 17 demographic groups at highest COVID-19 death ranked by our logistic model, it would require only 3.7% of the vaccine supply needed to vaccinate all the United States, and yet prevent 47% of COVID-19 deaths. Nursing home residents had a higher COVID-19 death risk at 5,200 deaths/100,000, more than our highest demographic risk group. Risk of prison residents and health care workers (HCW) were lower than that of our demographic groups with the highest risks. We saw much less concentration of COVID-19 case risk in any demographic groups compared to the high concentration of COVID-19 death in some such groups. We should prioritize vaccinations with the goal of reducing deaths, not cases, while the vaccine supply is low. ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 vaccines protect against severe COVID-19 infection and thus against COVID-19 death per vaccine studies. Allocating at least some of the early vaccine supplies to high risk demographic groups could maximize lives saved. Our model, and the risk estimate it produced, could help states define their vaccine allocation rules.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Covid-19 Incidence and Mortality in the United States 94%
- Continued Age Shift of Confirmed Positive COVID-19 Incidence Over Time to Children and Young Adults: Washington State March - August 2020 94%
- Time trends, factors associated with, and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a massive online survey of US adults: January-May 2021 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns in Covid-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in the United States from March 2020 to February 2022 95%
- Contributions of occupation characteristics and educational attainment to racial/ethnic inequities in COVID-19 mortality 94%
- The Joint Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Infections, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: An Agent-Based Simulation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 97%
- COVID-19 Mortality in California Based on Death Certificates: Disproportionate Impacts Across Racial/Ethnic Groups and Nativity 94%
- Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November, 2020 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of COVID-19 Reinfection and Vaccine Breakthrough Infection, Madera County, California, 2021 95%
- The US Midlife Mortality Crisis Continues: Excess Cause-Specific Mortality During 2020 94%
- Estimating protection afforded by prior infection in preventing reinfection: Applying the test-negative study design 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.