Public adherence to governmental recommendations regarding quarantine and testing for COVID-19 in two Norwegian cohorts
Carlsen, E. O.; Caspersen, I. H.; Trogstad, L.; Gjessing, H.; Magnus, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundCombatting the COVID-19 pandemic relies at present on non-pharmacological interventions. Governments are using various approaches from general advice to full lockdown. There is a need to describe and understand adherence to public health actions. MethodsParticipants from two ongoing cohorts, the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and The Norwegian Influenza Pregnancy Cohort (NorFlu), answered questionnaires every 14 days since March 2020. From the summer of 2020, testing for presence of SARS-CoV-2 became easily available. Recommendations were that respiratory symptoms should lead to testing, and that confirmed or suspected COVID-19 should be followed by quarantine. We estimated the adherence to these guidelines in responses from cohort participants in the period August to October 2020. ResultsLess than 40% of men who were ill and less than 45% of women who were ill, tested themselves for SARS-CoV-2 during the same 14-day periods. Among subjects tested for COVID-19, about 53% of men and 59% of women reported quarantine. For subjects with a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 diagnosis, the proportions quarantined were 65% for men and 72% for women. ConclusionsPublic adherence to governmental recommendations regarding testing and quarantine were lower than expected in a country with high trust in government. This leaves considerable room for improvement in adherence, possibly reducing the need for more restrictive interventions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation in children and adolescents in Norway: A nationwide population-based study. 95%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 94%
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A test-negative case-control study with additional population controls 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of COVID-19 on sick leave 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 viral load distribution in different patient populations and age groups reveals that viral loads increase with age 92%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among adults in three regions of France following the lockdown and associated risk factors: a multicohort study. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic position and SARS-CoV-2 infections: seroepidemiological findings from a German nationwide dynamic cohort 94%
- Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 into and within immigrant households. Nation-wide registry-study from Norway 94%
- Estimating the risk of post-COVID condition (PCC) in deprived communities, migrants and ethnic minorities in England: Findings from Virus Watch - a prospective community cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of RT-PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection at schools: First results from the Austrian School-SARS-CoV-2 Study 93%
- Risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections during 2020-2022 in Vojvodina, Serbia: a population-level study 93%
- Extremely high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a strictly-Orthodox Jewish community in the UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Secondary attack rates of COVID-19 in Norwegian families: A nation-wide register-based study 95%
- Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within households: a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands and Belgium – Interim results 92%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.