Back

Biotic and abiotic factors shaping the genome of cockle (Cerastoderma edule) in the Northeast Atlantic: a baseline for sustainable management of its wild resources

Vera, M.; Maroso, F.; Wilmes, S. B.; Hermida, M.; Blanco, A.; Fernandez, C.; Groves, E.; Malham, S. K.; Bouza, C.; Martinez, P.

2020-12-18 genomics
10.1101/2020.12.17.423063 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Knowledge on how environmental factors shape the genome of marine species is crucial for sustainable management of fisheries and wild populations. The edible cockle (Cerastoderma edule) is a marine bivalve distributed along the Northeast Atlantic coast of Europe and is an important resource from both commercial and ecological perspectives. We performed a population genomics screening using 2b-RAD genotyping on 9,309 SNPs localised in the cockles genome on a sample of 536 specimens pertaining to 14 beds in the Northeast Atlantic to ascertain its genetic structure regarding environmental variation. Larval dispersal modelling considering species behaviour and interannual variability in ocean conditions was carried out, as an essential background to compare genetic information with. Cockle populations in the Northeast Atlantic were shown to be panmictic and displayed low but significant geographical differentiation across populations (FST = 0.0240; P < 0.001), albeit not across generations. We identified 441 outlier SNPs related to divergent selection, sea surface temperature being the main environmental driver following a latitudinal axis. Two main genetic groups were identified, northwards and southwards of French Brittany, in accordance with our modelling, which demonstrated a barrier for larval dispersal linked to the Ushant front. Further genetic subdivision was observed using outlier loci and considering larval behaviour. The northern group was divided into the Irish/Celtic Seas and the English Channel/North Sea, while the southern group was divided into three subgroups. This information represents the baseline for management of cockles, designing conservation strategies, founding broodstock for depleted beds, and producing suitable seed for aquaculture production.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
21
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%